SUMMARY
YEARS OF ENGINEERING WORK
- Projects
- Tests
- Decisions
- Failures
- Tradeoffs
THE SAME SUMMARY HAS TO WORK FOR EVERY DECISION.
For hard-tech engineering teams
See the evidence before the interview.
RealEngineers finds the parts of an engineer's actual past work that matter to the technical problems you're hiring them to solve.
You make the judgment. We find the evidence.
Hiring for
Lunar Rover
Communications Lead
Candidate has
Worth looking at
Intermittent communications under constrained power
Candidate designed around unreliable connectivity while balancing system power constraints.
Why this matters
Relevant to communication-system reliability under constrained operating conditions.
Evidence
Project X · Design Review
Source citation
Page 14
Original project document
Hundreds of pages underneath. Three pieces worth your attention.
Thanks to the teams helping build RealEngineers







HOW IT WORKS
A summary decides what's important before it knows your question. RealEngineers starts with your question, then finds the work that matters.
YEARS OF ENGINEERING WORK
THE SAME SUMMARY HAS TO WORK FOR EVERY DECISION.
Could this radar engineer be relevant to my sonar role?
EVIDENCE THAT MATTERS
THE DECISION CHANGES WHAT COMES FORWARD.
SAME ENGINEER. DIFFERENT DECISION. DIFFERENT EVIDENCE.
MORE UNDERNEATH. LESS FOR YOU TO READ.
WHY IT MATTERS
The engineer stays the same. What matters changes with the problem you're hiring them to solve.
SAME ENGINEER
HIRING FOR
REALENGINEERS BRINGS FORWARD:
HIRING FOR
REALENGINEERS BRINGS FORWARD:
THE ENGINEER DIDN'T CHANGE. THE QUESTION CHANGED WHAT MATTERED.
A summary has to decide what is important before it knows the question. RealEngineers waits until the question is known.
WHY REALENGINEERS
The problem is not that your technical team can't recognize good engineering. The problem is finding the right evidence across many candidates and years of work.
YEARS OF ENGINEERING WORK UNDERNEATH
CANDIDATE 18
Solved a closely related signal-detection problem.
CANDIDATE 43
Owned subsystem integration under similar constraints.
CANDIDATE 71
Debugged the same type of environmental failure your role owns.
Your team investigates the few things worth judging.
MORE EVIDENCE UNDERNEATH. LESS FOR YOUR TEAM TO READ.
YOU MAKE THE JUDGMENT. WE FIND WHERE TO LOOK.
The boundary
It does not decide whether someone is a good engineer. It does not decide who you should hire. It does not replace the technical interview.
Better interviews
Without RealEngineers
“Tell me about this project.”
With RealEngineers
“I saw why you changed the antenna placement after the interference test. Walk me through that tradeoff.”
For rigorous teams
Example output
What deserves attention
Candidate encountered random vibration failures during connector qualification.
Why it may matter
Your role owns environmental qualification for flight hardware.
Evidence
Qualification Report
Page 14
What to probe
“How did you determine whether the failure came from the connector, mounting condition, or vibration profile?”
“As a non-technical founder, I wish I had RealEngineers. It would have helped me vet hard-tech engineers the way strong technical teams do, without having that expertise myself. My startup might have survived.”
Two ways to use RealEngineers
Candidates apply
RE surfaces relevant evidence
Your team knows where to probe
Technical interview
You decide
For engineers

Keep the evidence. Let relevance emerge when the problem is known.
One body of work. Many future decisions.
FAQ
Evidence should be inspectable. Your technical team makes the call.
No. Your team evaluates candidates. RealEngineers finds evidence in their past work that may matter to your decision and lets you inspect the underlying source.
Put RealEngineers to the test
Give RealEngineers one hard-to-evaluate engineering role and candidate work. We'll show you the evidence worth looking at before the interview.
You make the judgment. We find the evidence.